Goldeneye (1995)

When it’s on: Friday, 5 February (9.00 pm)
Channel: ITV4
IMDb Link

Looking back at Goldeneye and it’s easy to forget what a throw of the dice it was. Six years had elapsed since Licence to Kill, the last entry in the series, with many suggesting the gentleman spy had fired his last Walther PPK. Perhaps it was time. The underwhelming late Moore years, which saw 007 lapse into self-parody, gave way to two films starring Timothy Dalton that threatened to harden the tone of the character only to run into audience apathy. During Bond’s hiatus, a new film franchise introducing the character of CIA researcher Jack Ryan, based on Tom Clancy’s bestselling novels, seemed to serve up a replacement action hero. Ryan, played once by Alex Baldwin and twice by Harrison Ford, worked in a modern world that was comfortable with up to date technology and fought against contemporary opponents in the shape of terrorist cells and drug dealers. The biggest difference between Bond and Ryan was that the latter remained an implacable family man – Patriot Games pivoted on his wife and daughter being threatened – and had nothing but chaste respect for his female colleagues. A nail in the coffin of Bond’s old school casual liaisons with members of the opposite sex, possibly. Ryan appeared to be a hero for the post-AIDS 1990s. And then there was the fact the world itself had changed since Licence to Kill. During 007’s six year lay-off, the Berlin War had collapsed and the Cold War ended. Russia was blinking in the sunlight of a new capitalist era, consigning the Communist iconography to the graveyard. Did this include Bond, the character created to be a Cold Warrior and now without a war to fight?

At the time of Goldeneye’s release, I think most of us were just relieved that it wasn’t rubbish, in fact it was surprisingly good and part of its success was that it dealt directly with two of the franchise’s biggest issues – Bond’s womanising, and his existence within a post-Iron Curtain world. The new M was played by Judi Dench and made it clear at her first meeting with Bond that she didn’t think much of him, putting him firmly in his place after the sighing patronage of Bernard Lee. Goldeneye’s two female protagonists were also strong women. Izabella Scorupco’s computer programmer had an uncanny ability to stay alive without needing Bond’s help, whilst compensating for his technical limitations when the plot required some IT acumen. Femme fatale Xenia Onatopp(!) was played by Famke Janssen as an outright psychopath, capable of killing men with her thighs and achieving orgasm when gunning people down. A worthy adversary for 007, who at one stage nearly fell victim to her murderous legs.

As for the new world of the 1990s, Goldeneye made great use of the former Cold War by filming some action sequences in St Petersburg and placing one of its key scenes in a graveyard for Communist iconography. Old adversaries, such as Robbie Coltrane’s Russian gangster (watch out for a brief cameo by Minnie Driver as Coltrane’s wife, gleefully murdering Stand By Your Man as a heavily Russian accented country singer) are now uneasy allies in this spirit of Detente, one that leaves Bond feeling visibly uneasy. As M suggested, he’s a relic, uncertain of his place in this new era, and he knows it.

For their new actor, Eon went back to a previous drawing board and recruited the Irish star, Pierce Brosnan, who famously almost landed the part years earlier until contractual commitments to Remington Steele meant he couldn’t be released and it went to Timothy Dalton instead. Brosnan certainly looked the part and was capable of both levity and hard-nosed action, which pretty much made him ideal for the role. It’s too simple to look back at Brosnan’s quartet of Bonds as lightweight missed opportunities and see the actor as shouldering some of the blame. The intention of his movies was clearly to riff on the success of Goldfinger and the sequence of entries that followed, dropping the tough and gritty Dalton 007 in favour of a spy crafted in the Connery template – cheeky, sexy and fun. Brosnan played his part, recreating Connery’s invulnerability especially when making it unscathed through a hailstorm of bullets, but he also showed a neat harder edge when the role called for it. In the film, his former 00 colleague, Alec Trevelyan (Sean Bean), who Bond believed to be dead, resurfaces as a villain and proves he’s a match for the hero. Having to face and ultimately kill Trevelyan, the pain of this tells on the ordinarily chipper Bond, who contemplates his upcoming mission with suitable levels of solemnity. It’s a change in tone that only takes place in the film sporadically, but it fits the character and his situation, and demonstrated Brosnan was more than capable of acting these moments out.

The yin and yang aspect of the two former friends working against each other elevates Goldeneye into the best of the Brosnan series. Bean, saddled with some terrible moustache twirling dialogue, gets by thanks to sheer charisma and throwing himself into the action, a contrast to Jonathan Price’s more ‘classic’ villain in the following entry, which showed just how much this dimension – and Bean himself – added to the mix. Martin Campbell,  best known previously for helming the acclaimed BBC series Edge of Darkness, jollies the narrative along nicely as director, allowing the usual brilliant stuntcraft to become part of the story rather than the focal point of the entire movie. A good thing, as certain moments – such as Bond falling off a cliff edge behind a plane, skydiving into the craft’s door and then piloting it back to safety – stretch credibility to beyond even the breaking point of sequences in past entries, and it’s scenes like the Communist graveyard that really resonate.

There’s a thoughtful premise hidden within this one, a serious 007 that might have chimed with Bob Peck’s tortured hero in Edge of Darkness, or Daniel Craig as a young Bond in Campbell’s only other directorial outing in the series, Casino Royale. But Goldeneye never quite commits to either route. Too often, it wants to be both a thriller of substance and a bit of fun, and the two jar. Bond driving a tank through the streets of St Petersburg, whilst a laugh, does slap the face of anyone wanting to prefix 007’s agent status with the word ‘secret’, and the whole thing ends up in – but of course! – a lair hidden beneath a Caribbean lake. All the same, there’s nothing to really dislike, and Brosnan’s energetic performance was enough to breathe life back into old Mr Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. At least for a while.

Goldeneye: ***

Advertisements

7 Replies to “Goldeneye (1995)”

  1. A good, solid return to form at a time, as you rightly point out, when the Bond series looked like it might be finished. Hard to believe this is over 20 years ago now!

    1. Thanks Colin and yes, how time flies! I remember really enjoying the first time around the block and it’s only with subsequent viewings that my feelings have levelled out a little – perhaps in light of some of the more recent entries, possibly down to some moments just being a bit daft! Still, it’s a fun film and I like Brosnan in the role – a lot don’t and blame him for some of these movies, but as 007 I think he was a good choice.

  2. Along with TWINE this is my favourite Brosnan, not least because the first half is mostly the story of the character played by Izabella Scorpio, who i think is wonderful in the film (really bugs me that is isn’t better known). And the leap off the dam at the beginning ranks among the best of the pre-credit stunts. Shame the music by Eric Serra doesn’t work but the cast is great, the story solid, the stunts first rate – what’s not to love. I think Campbell did even better with CASINO ROYALE though.

    1. Thanks Sergio – I’m definitely with you about Scorupco. She can convincingly be both vulnerable and strong in this, and the character has a lot more depth than the usual Bond girl. With subsequent watches of GOLDENEYE it’s she that stands out over Janssen’s OTT psycho (who I quite like also, in that unhinged Barbara Carrera in NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN sense).

      I agree also that CASINO ROYALE is a great entry – looking forward to covering it one of these days, but then I suppose it was always going to be better given it was Bond with the brakes taken off and not having to work to the usual template, which for me is where GOLDENEYE suffers.

      Forgot to mention the score – not as bad as NSNA, but it did make me miss John Barry, especially when he mangled the opening gun barrel sequence.

  3. I grew up during the Brosnan era, so I have a soft spot for all of them. Don’t think I’ve revisited any since Craig came along, though, so I can’t be entirely sure what I’d make now.

    I think the limp ending afforded him by Die Another Day, plus the change in public taste that means Craig’s serious style is ‘on trend’, has led to Brosnan being written off and blamed for his films, which I too disagree about. It’s very much a contrast to how I think he was received at the time, as a kind of “best of Bond” synthesis of Connery and Moore. That’s how a few of his films play too, DAD most obviously, but it perhaps explains GoldenEye‘s attempts to reconcile serious elements (as from early Connery) with more ‘fun’ ones (as from late Connery / Moore).

    1. Thanks Bob. It’s a while since I watched this one also and some of the faults did stick out with this screening – I don’t think it’s a patch on some of the recent entries (better than QUANTUM obviously) and it feels somewhat shallow, like a Bond film made to fit a certain template, whereas the Craig starrers have consciously broken that mould with often startling results. Some scenes, such as Bond’s bants with Q, just come across as blatant fan service, but most importantly what remains a lot of fun and really there’s nothing wrong with that. The world has moved on, though, if you know what I mean.

      1. I think the Bond series has always done a pretty good job of moving with the times — better than some people would think, considering in some circles it has a reputation for being old fashioned. But I think there was a lot of nostalgia floating around in the run up to the millennium, and the Brosnan era tapped into that perfectly; then things moved on post-9/11, and Bond rolled with those punches too. It’s almost impossible to know where it might go next because I imagine it will shift with the times. If Bond pastiches like Kingsman continue to prove popular, maybe we’ll even see a return to volcano bases and all that jazz!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s