The Admirable Crichton (1957)

When it’s on: Tuesday, 13 January (1.10 pm)
Channel: Film4
IMDb Link

The study of class difference has always fascinated UK cinema, in particular looking back at a past in which the gulf between patrician and plebeian members was brought into sharper focus within single households. The success of TV shows like Upstairs Downstairs and Downton Abbey prove that the interest has not waned, especially the status of the serving classes jarring with their wealthy employers. It’s little wonder that stately homes now open to the public attract millions of visitors. The glimpse into the kind of world that no longer exists, massive buildings housing single families and with labyrinthine quarters for the servants, is an almost surreal experience in the twenty-first century.

The Admirable Crichton was adapted from J M Barrie’s play, a comedy that was written and first performed in 1902 to enormous success. The first film version appeared in 1918, and since then it has been adapted for the radio and television, though this version from 1957 remains the best known. It was filmed in colour, with much of the action taking place on Bermuda to replicate the sun-kissed paradise in which our misfit heroes find themselves. Lewis Gilbert directed, and Director of Photography Wilkie Cooper’s eye for composition excelled in showing the attraction of the characters’ island home over its hardships. It really does look like a ravishing location on which to be stranded.

The eponymous Crichton (Kenneth More) is butler to Lord Loam (Cecil Parker), senior politician and owner of the vast Loam Hall. A practising Liberal, Lord Loam believes that his three daughters should acquaint themselves with a future in which all people are treated equally, and arranges gloriously awkward sessions in which the family and servants mix, to everyone’s bemusement. It’s the era of Suffragism, but Crichton cares little for the equalising of society, nor his master’s efforts to simulate this within the home. He’s the perfect butler, managing the staff with a firm but fair hand and believing strongly in the prolonging of tradition. One of the daughters is arrested for being involved in a heated Suffragette rally, and to avoid scandal Crichton suggests the family take a voyage to the South Seas. All goes wrong when the cruise runs into stormy waters, the boat sinks and the survivors find themselves on a beautiful but entirely uninhabited island. Along with Crichton and Lord Loam are the three daughters, two young male aristocrat friends, and Cockney girl Eliza (Diane Cilento), the maid known as ‘Tweeny’ because her serving role sees her move between roles.

Whilst the strandees aren’t in any real danger, it’s clear they have no idea how to cope with their new environment – Crichton asks the noblemen to tie their rowing boat to a rock, but they wrap the rope around a turtle instead, which duly ambles off into the sea and their vessel floats away. It turns out only Crichton has any practical knowledge and, after some initial tension, he emerges as the group’s leader. Two years pass. The roles reverse, Lord Loam serving Crichton in menial duties and being renamed ‘Daddy’, whilst the Butler now goes by ‘Guvnor’ and has used his skills to build houses, source food from the sea and create a reasonably comfortable life for them all. The men all love Tweeny, but she loves her Guvnor, a problem exacerbated as Crichton falls for Daddy’s eldest daughter, Mary (Sally Ann Howes). This culminates in a wedding ceremony between them, yet before the nuptials can be completed the spy a passing boat. Do they light the beacon and get rescued, returning to civilisation, or will they stay where they have found a semblance of happiness and equality?

Renamed Paradise Lagoon for the American market, the film was made as a vehicle for More, a genuine British box office draw in the 1950s and at his best in roles that emphasised his stolid masculinity. More was initially reticent about taking the part, but comes into his own when the action moves to the island and his practical skills and natural charisma come to the fore. He’s supported by a fine cast, veteran Parker nearly stealing the picture as the befuddled Lord who engages enthusiastically in becoming the servant once his circumstances change. Cilento has the film’s heart as the adorable Tweeny and, for this viewer, was a far better match for Crichton than Mary, a British alternative to Grace Kelly whose aloof persona never really cracked.

The Admirable Crichton is a perfectly enjoyable comedy-drama, strangely unthreatening to modern audiences who have the more visceral survival tale of something like Cast Away with which to compare it, yet entirely likeable. Furthermore, it’s a delight to me to come across a movie in which so much takes place and it’s all over in just over ninety minutes, points made succinctly, characters suitably developed; economic film making it its finest.

The Admirable Crichton: ***

8 Replies to “The Admirable Crichton (1957)”

  1. I agree, it’s a pleasant little movie – nothing really special but charming enough in its own way, and More is always watchable.
    I’m with you too on the point about economical filmmaking and there’s nothing I like more than good, succinct storytelling with the flab stripped away. Every film is not an epic, nor should they strive to be. In a way, the telling of a simple story in 90 minutes or less has become something of a lost art. Something similar happened with books too – slim, compact volumes which told their tale effectively were gradually replaced by huge Tolstoy-style tomes.

    1. Thanks Colin. I suppose the worst/best example of bloated film making has to be pretty much anything turned out by Peter Jackson these days – not everything has to be Lord of the Rings length, and yet we have the updated version of King Kong, which took pains to demonstrate what a brilliant, tightly told tale the original was. I quite enjoyed Jackson’s Kong, especially Serkis, but that three-hour running time really stretched things out and unfortunately emphasised the essential silliness of the story.

      1. For what it’s worth, I think Jackson’s problem is a lack of self control (and, in the wake of Rings‘ success, very few studio-type people would say “no” to him). I don’t think he sets out to turn everything into an ultra-epic, I think he just throws in every idea he has and then can’t bear to cut any of it.

        On topic: not seen The Admirable Crichton, but it now goes on the “to catch” list.

      2. Thanks Bob. I get the point, but it’s a bit worrying when we’re talking about a movie costing hundreds of millions of dollars, no? A lot riding on a director who has his indulgences, I’d imagine.

        I hope you get to see Crichton, it’s a jolly ninety minutes.

      3. Very true. You can see why they’ve allowed it with The Hobbit — it’s a licence to print money, so what studio exec would’ve turned down a whole extra film? — but surely it only takes a flop or two, as at Disney in the wake of John Carter and The Lone Ranger.

  2. The Admiral Crichton – I had not seen it before but it is exactly the sort of film I like. It reminded me of afternoon movies on the box when 3/4 channels were all we had to choose from. I really like the stiff Crichton relaxing his own role to survive while the upper class became the doers under his direction. The switcheroo on their return and charming ending makes this an ideal Sunday afternoon film. Not too taxing just light hearted entertainment.

    1. Thanks Mrs B and I completely agree with the BBC2 afternoon showing – films we watched as kids, from an age that already seemed to be long in the past.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s