The Saint in New York (1938)

When it’s on: Tuesday, 24 July (12.00 pm)
Channel: BBC2
IMDb Link

Ah, summer holidays. A chance for the BBC to throw out a season of classic movies, for no one in particular and not necessarily in the right order. But here we are, presented with the welcome sight of eight RKO pictures based on Leslie Charteris’s Saint novels. BBC2 screened a double bill yesterday, and are doing the same today. The second title is one of the series’ later entries, The Saint meets the Tiger, but first we get The Saint in New York, which also happens to be the franchise opener. It’s to be hoped that later in the holidays, the BBC will follow its Saint run with another scheduling of MGM’s Tarzan films, whilst Mrs Mike would ask for a post-modern, ‘knowing’ second chance for Charlie Chan.

Back to the Saint, with Louis Hayward in the first of his two film appearances as Simon Templar (the second would be years later). The film was intended to be a B-movie quickie, and that’s exactly what it was, Ben Holmes directing economically in ensuring the finished product ran little over the 70-minute mark. It opens with men talking, essentially discussing the set-up for the entire plot. They’re police, involved in the protection of New York, only the Big Apple’s suffering a crime wave and six men have been identified as responsible. The rozzers don’t know what to do. They appear entirely unable to stop the criminals, until someone mentions Simon Templar aka The Saint.

In one of those narrative developments that must have made perfect sense in the 1930s, the NYPD effectively holds up its hands, declares itself beat and hands over all responsibility for dealing with the problem to a vigilante, indeed it’s made clear Templar doesn’t always work on the side of the angels. Nonetheless, he takes on the challenge of cleaning up the city, beginning with his shooting of a recently acquitted criminal who was about to execute one of the high ranking police officers. It isn’t long before he’s more or less in control, working his way through the less savoury elements of NY and building up to uncovering the identity of ‘the Big Fellow’, who runs the criminal fraternity from a position of complete secrecy.

It’s nothing new, and I don’t imagine for one moment the intention was to take the crime genre in a fascinating new direction. In Hayward’s hands, Templar seems to float through all the perilous situations in which he finds himself, as though he knows he’s the hero of the story and can never die, so why worry about it? If Hayward appears to be channelling anybody, then it’s definitely Orson Welles – the same amused expression, intonation and quickfire quips, which makes him both agreeable and impossible to identify with.

Yet there are moments worth waiting for, glimpses of an imaginative piece of work that occasionally shine through. Particularly good fun is the bit where the Saint escapes through a first floor window, only to perform an elaborate acrobatic manoeuvre to lever himself onto the roof. I also like the appearance of character actor stalwart Paul Guilfoyle, whose role in the film is to provide a commentary on the Saint’s actions – doing so soon makes him an admirer of Templar, ironic as he’s on the opposite side.

In another world, The Saint in New York might have been directed by Alfred Hitchcock, who was certainly interested in taking on the assignment. In his hands, it’s almost certain the film wouldn’t have looked so cheap or prosaically made, but for all the film making by balance sheet, it’s never terrible. And for all Hayward would be overshadowed in the role by George Sanders (we’ll do a Sanders Saint tomorrow), he’s still better than Val Kilmer could dream of being.

The Saint in New York: **

Advertisements

7 Replies to “The Saint in New York (1938)”

  1. Damn, forgot it was on! I think Hayward is excellent in the film, and actually well suited to the darker, rougher conception of the character. Havign Sanders ake the role over for the series was probably a smart move commercially though as he definitely had more charm – great stuff Mike.

    1. Thanks Sergio. George Sanders feels like he was born to play the Saint, doesn’t he, but I was quite taken with Hayward’s playing and I just love the gangster who provides a running commentary of Templar’s doings.

  2. Quite why BBC Two are showing these in such a jumbled order is a mystery, though considering the kind of pictures they are I doubt it matters. But being a stickler for such things I’m recording them and intend to watch in order (my only previous experience of The Saint is the Kilmer film, which I saw so long ago I’ve completely forgotten it).

    This is utter hokum really, but entertaining for it. I can only agree that Guilfoyle is the highlight, though I liked Hayward’s cocky, witty performance. Seems a shame he only did one more (which it doesn’t look like the Beeb are showing, presumably a rights thing as it was made so much later/by Hammer) and he’s a watermark I’ll be comparing Sanders to.

    1. Thanks Bob. I’m just about old enough to remember the ‘Return of’ TV series starring Ian Ogilvy, but apart from that it’s the Kilmer film for me also and yet another instance of Hollywood getting these ‘remake’ things wrong – of similar projects, I far prefer The Shadow, which at least treated the whole thing as a bit of a laugh and just had fun with it. Mind you, the Orbital version of the Saint theme is classic.

      And I guess you’re right – the order of the screenings doesn’t matter that much. I’m left to wonder whether ‘..in London’ being first on the bill had something to do with shoehorning something London-themed into the schedules due to some little sporting event that’s looming, and the rest just kind of fitted in afterwards.

      I prefer Sanders to Hayward, but that doesn’t make the latter poor, in fact I think he plays the Saint as a much darker character than Sanders.

      1. I’ve always quite enjoyed The Shadow as well — again, not seen it for years, but I remember liking it (in spite of some reviews), whereas literally the only thing I remember of Kilmer’s Saint is the fact I’ve seen it!

        The in London/Olympics connection is better than anything I can see. I briefly thought they were just in alphabetical order, but showing in Palm Springs before in New York mucks that up (though if I remember rightly it works for the rest, so…)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s